RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Infinity Forex Funds vs Blue Guardian
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
IFXF
Infinity Forex Funds
BLGD
Blue Guardian
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
—
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Forex
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
Infinity Forex Funds PROS
- +UK-based regulation environment may offer traders a degree of additional oversight and credibility.
- +Forex-focused offering targets the largest and most liquid financial market globally.
- +Specialisation in forex may indicate a refined and expert evaluation process for currency traders.
- +A focused market offering can simplify the trading environment for forex-specialist traders.
Infinity Forex Funds CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no exposure to indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy