RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Instant Funding vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

IFND
Instant Funding
EST. 2021
The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
INSTANT FUNDING
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT
60/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER74/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$1,280,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$5,000,000
$459
MIN COST
BETTER$99
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

INSTANT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Commodities, Indices, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

Instant Funding PROS

  • +Max funding of $1,280,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Weekly payouts offer more frequent access to profits than monthly schedules
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation slightly easier to pass

Instant Funding CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $459 is well above the industry average of $186.7
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

Instant Funding
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Instant Funding Full Review →The Trading Pit Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy