RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs WeGetFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
WGFD
WeGetFunded
ICFUNDED
METRIC
WEGETFUNDED
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$74BETTER
MIN COST
$199
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

WEGETFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto, Commodities, Indices
PLATFORMS
cTrader, MT5

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

WeGetFunded PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 4% is significantly lower than the industry average of 7.9%, limiting downside risk.
  • +Offers two well-regarded platforms, cTrader and MT5, giving traders flexible execution options.
  • +Covers four asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Commodities, and Indices for diversified trading.
  • +Min challenge cost of $199 is close to the industry average of $186.7, making entry reasonably accessible.

WeGetFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their gains.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more hoops to reach a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Higher trust score (50/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
WeGetFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →WeGetFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy