RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs WEBB Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD

ICFunded

WBBT

WEBB Traders

EST. 2009

ICFUNDED

METRIC

WEBB TRADERS

50/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$500,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$74

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: static
MARKETS: forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS: mt5
TYPES: forex, futures

WEBB TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ICFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
+Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
+Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
+Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

−Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
−Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

WEBB Traders PROS

+Founded in 2009, suggesting over 15 years of operational history and stability
+No data is available on profit split to compare against the 84.7% industry average
+No data is available on max funding to compare against the $839,272.7 industry average
+No data is available on challenge cost to compare against the $186.7 industry average

WEBB Traders CONS

−Virtually no financial or trading metrics are provided beyond founding date and country
−Traders cannot assess payout speed relative to the industry average of 6.5 days
−Absence of drawdown, profit target, and steps data prevents any meaningful comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded

Higher trust score (50/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ICFD