RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD

ICFunded

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

ICFUNDED

METRIC

SAVIUS

50/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$500,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$74BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: static
MARKETS: forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS: mt5
TYPES: forex, futures

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

ICFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
+Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
+Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
+Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

−Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
−Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded

Higher trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ICFD