Compare/ICFunded vs OneUp Trader

ICFunded vs OneUp Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Max funding of $500,000 exceeds the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
+News trading is permitted, giving traders flexibility during high-impact events.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of a failed challenge.
+Five markets offered including Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and Crypto.

−Profit split of 80% is below the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
−Payout window of 14 days is longer than the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
−Phase 1 profit target of 10% exceeds the average of 8.1% across listed firms.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
+Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
+Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
+Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.

−Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
−Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.

ICFunded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

OneUp Trader

Trust score 64/100. Faster payouts (1d). 90% profit split.