RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ICFunded vs Mako Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ICFD
ICFunded
MKOT
Mako Trading
ICFUNDED
METRIC
MAKO TRADING
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$500,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$74
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ICFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- static
- MARKETS
- forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
- PLATFORMS
- mt5
- TYPES
- forex, futures
MAKO TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ICFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
- +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
- +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
- +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.
ICFunded CONS
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
- −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.
Mako Trading PROS
- +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
- +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
- +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
- +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm
Mako Trading CONS
- −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
- −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy