RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD

ICFunded

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

ICFUNDED

METRIC

LUX TRADING FIRM

56/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER58/100

4.4/5BETTER

RATING

—2.8/5

80%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—75%

$500,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$10,000,000

$74BETTER

MIN COST

—$100

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

2—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: static
MARKETS: forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS: mt5
TYPES: forex, futures

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

ICFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
+Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
+Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
+Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

−Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
−Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded

Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ICFD