RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs Glow Node

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD

ICFunded

GLWN

Glow Node

ICFUNDED

METRIC

GLOW NODE

50/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$500,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$74

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: static
MARKETS: forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS: mt5
TYPES: forex, futures

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase

ICFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
+Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
+Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
+Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

−Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
−Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

Glow Node PROS

+Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

−Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
−No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
−Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded

Lower trust score (50/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ICFD