RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ICFunded vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ICFD
ICFunded
GFND
Get Funded Now
ICFUNDED
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$74BETTER
MIN COST
—$123
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ICFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- static
- MARKETS
- forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
- PLATFORMS
- mt5
- TYPES
- forex, futures
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
ICFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
- +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
- +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
- +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.
ICFunded CONS
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
- −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy