RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs FTUK

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
ICFUNDED
METRIC
FTUK
50/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$74BETTER
MIN COST
—$119
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
20%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Lower trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
FTUK
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →FTUK Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy