RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs FundedNext

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
FundedNext
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
ICFUNDED
METRIC
FUNDEDNEXT
50/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER88/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER95%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
$74
MIN COST
BETTER$49
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER4d
PASS RATE
29%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER6,750

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Relative
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

FundedNext PROS

  • +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Lower trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
FundedNext
Higher trust score (88/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →FundedNext Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy