RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs E8 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
ICFUNDED
METRIC
E8 FUNDING
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$74
MIN COST
BETTER$25
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Higher trust score (50/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
E8 Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →E8 Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy