RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ICFunded vs BuoyTrade
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ICFD
ICFunded
BUOY
BuoyTrade
ICFUNDED
METRIC
BUOYTRADE
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$1,024,000
$74—
MIN COST
BETTER$50
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ICFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- static
- MARKETS
- forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
- PLATFORMS
- mt5
- TYPES
- forex, futures
BUOYTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4
ICFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
- +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
- +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
- +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.
ICFunded CONS
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
- −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.
BuoyTrade PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
- +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
BuoyTrade CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy