RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
AQFT
AquaFutures
ICFUNDED
METRIC
AQUAFUTURES
50/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$500,000
MAX FUNDING
$74
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Higher trust score (50/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
AquaFutures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →AquaFutures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy