RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ICFunded vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ICFD
ICFunded
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
ICFUNDED
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
50/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$74—
MIN COST
BETTER$59
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • −Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • −Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

ICFunded
Lower trust score (50/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
OneFunded
Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ICFunded Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy