RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Hantec Trader vs Funded Futures Network
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
HNTC
Hantec Trader
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
HANTEC TRADER
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$250,000
$13BETTER
MIN COST
—$81
1d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
HANTEC TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower
Hantec Trader PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $13 is exceptionally low, far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is outstanding, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
Hantec Trader CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, offering very little buffer
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −News trading and weekend holding are not allowed, significantly restricting trading strategies
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Futures Network
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy