RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Hantec Trader vs Apex Trader Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
HNTC
Hantec Trader
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
HANTEC TRADER
METRIC
APEX TRADER FUNDING
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER2.75/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$13BETTER
MIN COST
—$35
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—8d
—
PASS RATE
31%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
HANTEC TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Hantec Trader PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $13 is exceptionally low, far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is outstanding, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
Hantec Trader CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, offering very little buffer
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −News trading and weekend holding are not allowed, significantly restricting trading strategies
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
PROPDNA VERDICT
Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (59/100). Slower payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy