RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Hola Prime vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
HLPR
Hola Prime
EST. 2023
LCDT
Lucid Trading
HOLA PRIME
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
70/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$2,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
HOLA PRIME DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, multi-asset, large-cap, crypto
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
Hola Prime PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional scaling potential.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, maximising strategy flexibility.
- +On-demand payouts and a broad market offering including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, and Crypto add strong value.
Hola Prime CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less protection.
- −Founded in 2023, Hola Prime has a limited operating history, which may raise longevity concerns for traders.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy