RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

HAP Capital vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

HAPC
HAP Capital
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
HAP CAPITAL
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
45/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
MIN COST
$1
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

HAP CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

HAP Capital PROS

  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

HAP Capital CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for HAP Capital, making any meaningful comparison impossible.
  • No profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are disclosed for benchmark comparison.
  • Traders cannot assess trading conditions or earning potential without core metrics being provided.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

HAP Capital
Lower trust score (45/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

HAP Capital Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy