RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Great Point Capital vs FTUK

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GPCP
Great Point Capital
FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
GREAT POINT CAPITAL
METRIC
FTUK
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$119
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
20%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

GREAT POINT CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

Great Point Capital PROS

  • +US-based firm may benefit from operating in a well-regulated and established financial environment.
  • +Great Point Capital name suggests an institutionally oriented approach to trader funding.
  • +US location may provide access to a broad range of market instruments and trading hours.
  • +Presence on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public accountability and visibility.

Great Point Capital CONS

  • −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

Great Point Capital
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FTUK
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Great Point Capital Full Review →FTUK Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy