RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Great Point Capital vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
GPCP
Great Point Capital
FNDF
FundedFast
GREAT POINT CAPITAL
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
GREAT POINT CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Great Point Capital PROS
- +US-based firm may benefit from operating in a well-regulated and established financial environment.
- +Great Point Capital name suggests an institutionally oriented approach to trader funding.
- +US location may provide access to a broad range of market instruments and trading hours.
- +Presence on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public accountability and visibility.
Great Point Capital CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
- −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy