RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Goat Funded vs The Trading Pit Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Goat Funded
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
GOAT FUNDED
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$49
MIN COST
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
TradeLocker, MT5

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Goat Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

  • +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
  • Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Goat Funded
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
The Trading Pit Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Goat Funded Full Review →The Trading Pit Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy