PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/Goat Funded vs Audacity Capital
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

Goat Funded vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
TRUST SCORE63/100TIE63/100TIE
PROFIT SPLIT80%90%BETTER
PAYOUT DAYS2d0dBETTER
MIN COST$49$42BETTER
MAX FUNDING$400,000$2,000,000BETTER
RATING3.56/54/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT4BETTER3
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedStatic

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
TradeLocker, MT5

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Goat Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Goat Funded
Higher trust score (63/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Goat Funded Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy