RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Glow Node vs ZoraFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GLWN
Glow Node
ZRFX
ZoraFX
GLOW NODE
METRIC
ZORAFX
47/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER48/100
4.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$59
PAYOUT DAYS
10d
PASS RATE
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Glow Node PROS

  • +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

  • Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
  • No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

ZoraFX PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
  • +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Glow Node
Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d.
ZoraFX
Higher trust score (48/100). Faster payouts at 10d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Glow Node Full Review →ZoraFX Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy