RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Glow Node vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GLWN
Glow Node
LCDT
Lucid Trading
GLOW NODE
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
$90
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Glow Node PROS

  • +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

  • Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
  • No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Glow Node
Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Glow Node Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy