RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Glow Node vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GLWN

Glow Node

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

GLOW NODE

METRIC

ONEFUNDED

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—55/100

3.5/5BETTER

RATING

—1/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

35%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Glow Node PROS

+Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

−Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
−No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
−Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Glow Node

Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH GLWN