RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Goat Funded Trader vs Goat Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
GFTR
Goat Funded Trader
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
GOAT FUNDED TRADER
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED
42/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
2/5—
RATING
BETTER3.43/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
GOAT FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
GOAT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- TradeLocker, MT5
Goat Funded Trader PROS
- +Covers both Forex and Futures markets, offering access to two distinct and liquid trading environments.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
- +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.
Goat Funded Trader CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for Goat Funded Trader beyond market types.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
- −No profit split, challenge cost, or funding data is provided for any meaningful industry comparison.
Goat Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
Goat Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy