RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Goat Funded Trader vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GFTR
Goat Funded Trader
Apex Trader Funding
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
GOAT FUNDED TRADER
METRIC
APEX TRADER FUNDING
42/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
2/5
RATING
BETTER2.75/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
MIN COST
$35
PAYOUT DAYS
8d
PASS RATE
31%
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

GOAT FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, large-cap

Goat Funded Trader PROS

  • +Covers both Forex and Futures markets, offering access to two distinct and liquid trading environments.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
  • +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

Goat Funded Trader CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for Goat Funded Trader beyond market types.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
  • No profit split, challenge cost, or funding data is provided for any meaningful industry comparison.

Apex Trader Funding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

  • Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
  • Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Goat Funded Trader
Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Goat Funded Trader Full Review →Apex Trader Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy