RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Get Funded Now vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GFND

Get Funded Now

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

GET FUNDED NOW

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

57/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

2/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$123—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Get Funded Now PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits

Get Funded Now CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Get Funded Now

Lower trust score (57/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

START WITH GFND