RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Goat Funded Futures vs OFP Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GFFU

Goat Funded Futures

OFPF

OFP Funding

EST. 2021

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES

METRIC

OFP FUNDING

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$150

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Futures

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradingView

Goat Funded Futures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
+Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
+Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
+Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

Goat Funded Futures CONS

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

OFP Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Goat Funded Futures

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH GFFU