RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Genk Capital vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GENK

Genk Capital

EST. 2010

QT Funded

EST. 2023

GENK CAPITAL

METRIC

QT FUNDED

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER72/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$12

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Genk Capital PROS

+Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
+Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
+Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
+Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
−Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Genk Capital

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH GENK