RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Genk Capital vs MyFlashFunding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
MFFL
MyFlashFunding
GENK CAPITAL
METRIC
MYFLASHFUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$15
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
GENK CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets
MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, Sway Charts
Genk Capital PROS
- +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
- +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
- +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
- +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.
Genk Capital CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
- −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
- −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.
MyFlashFunding PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.
MyFlashFunding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy