RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Genk Capital vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
FNDF
FundedFast
GENK CAPITAL
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
GENK CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Genk Capital PROS
- +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
- +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
- +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
- +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.
Genk Capital CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
- −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
- −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy