RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Genk Capital vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
GENK CAPITAL
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
47/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4.33/5
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$79
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Genk Capital
Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Genk Capital Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy