RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Genk Capital vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GENK

Genk Capital

EST. 2010

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

GENK CAPITAL

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

47/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

4.33/5BETTER

RATING

—2.75/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$300,000

—

MIN COST

$35

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

31%

2—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Genk Capital PROS

+Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
+Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
+Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
+Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
−Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
−Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Genk Capital

Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH GENK