RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Genk Capital vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
GENK CAPITAL
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$59
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Genk Capital
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
OneFunded
Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Genk Capital Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy