RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs Optimal Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
OPTM
Optimal Traders
FXIFY
METRIC
OPTIMAL TRADERS
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
49/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4.33/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$32
MIN COST
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
15%
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER4

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

OPTIMAL TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

Optimal Traders PROS

  • +The firm name implies an optimisation-focused approach to trader evaluation and development.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
  • +A structured funding model, if present, could support disciplined and performance-driven traders.
  • +Potential for competitive terms cannot be ruled out without further data disclosure.

Optimal Traders CONS

  • No data whatsoever has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make any informed decisions without full disclosure of this firm's core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Optimal Traders
Lower trust score (49/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →Optimal Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy