RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
MNVF
Monevis Funding
EST. 2024
FXIFY
METRIC
MONEVIS FUNDING
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$32
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

Monevis Funding PROS

  • +Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
  • +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
  • +No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
  • +No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

  • −Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
  • −No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
  • −Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Monevis Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →Monevis Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy