RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FXIFY
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$32
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →Kershner Trading Group Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy