RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FXIFY vs Goat Funded Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
GFFU
Goat Funded Futures
FXIFY
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED FUTURES
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—45/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$32
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
15%
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
FXIFY DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, multi-asset, fast-payout
GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Futures
FXIFY PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
- +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
- +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.
FXIFY CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
- −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.
Goat Funded Futures PROS
- +Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
- +Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
- +Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
- +Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.
Goat Funded Futures CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy