RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FXIFY vs Fuze Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
FUZE
Fuze Traders
FXIFY
METRIC
FUZE TRADERS
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$32
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FXIFY DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, multi-asset, fast-payout
FUZE TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FXIFY PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
- +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
- +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.
FXIFY CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
- −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.
Fuze Traders PROS
- +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
- +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
- +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
- +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.
Fuze Traders CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
- −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
- −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy