RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs E8 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
FXIFY
METRIC
E8 FUNDING
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$32—
MIN COST
BETTER$25
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
E8 Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →E8 Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy