RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
FXIFY
METRIC
BULENOX
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—71/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$32BETTER
MIN COST
—$99
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Bulenox
Lower trust score (71/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy