RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
FXIFY
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$32BETTER
MIN COST
—$42
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
15%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy