RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FXIFY vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
AQFT
AquaFutures
FXIFY
METRIC
AQUAFUTURES
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—43/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$32
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
15%
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • −Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
AquaFutures
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FXIFY Full Review →AquaFutures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy