RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The5ers vs The Trading Pit Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FV5R
The5ers
EST. 2016
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
THE5ERS
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$4,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$15
MIN COST
—
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
THE5ERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
The5ers PROS
- +100% profit split is the maximum possible and far exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established prop firms in the industry.
The5ers CONS
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for loss.
- −Market access is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across other asset classes.
The Trading Pit Futures PROS
- +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
The Trading Pit Futures CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
- −Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy