RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The5ers vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FV5R
The5ers
EST. 2016
LCDT
Lucid Trading
THE5ERS
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—90%
$4,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$15BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
THE5ERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
The5ers PROS
- +100% profit split is the maximum possible and far exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established prop firms in the industry.
The5ers CONS
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for loss.
- −Market access is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across other asset classes.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy