RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fuze Traders vs E8 Markets

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUZE
Fuze Traders
E8 Markets
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
FUZE TRADERS
METRIC
E8 MARKETS
40/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
1/5
RATING
BETTER4.6/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$1,000,000
MIN COST
$58
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

FUZE TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Fuze Traders PROS

  • +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
  • +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
  • +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
  • +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.

Fuze Traders CONS

  • No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
  • Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
  • Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.

E8 Markets PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

  • Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
  • Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fuze Traders
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.
E8 Markets
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fuze Traders Full Review →E8 Markets Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy