RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedElite vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FUNDE2
FundedElite
EST. 2023
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
FUNDEDELITE
METRIC
SAVIUS
58/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$300,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$300,000
$39BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
3dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE3d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FUNDEDELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
FundedElite PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedElite CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy